Circle CEO Defends USDC's Network Edge as Bernstein Flags OUSD as Duopoly Challenger
Bernstein has identified OUSD as potentially the strongest new challenger to the Circle-Tether stablecoin duopoly, even as Circle's chief executive moved to underscore USDC's network advantages. The research firm…
Bernstein has identified OUSD as potentially the strongest new challenger to the Circle-Tether stablecoin duopoly, even as Circle's chief executive moved to underscore USDC's network advantages. The research firm tempered its assessment by flagging unresolved questions around OUSD's governance, operations, and revenue sharing.
Bernstein's OUSD Assessment
Bernstein's framing is significant: calling OUSD the strongest prospective challenger to the Circle-Tether pair places it above prior contenders that attempted to erode the two incumbents' combined grip on the stablecoin market. The firm stopped short of a full endorsement, however. Its analysts pointed to open questions on governance structure, operational arrangements, and how revenue would be distributed — details that typically determine whether institutional participants treat a new stablecoin as a usable settlement layer or a speculative instrument.
Those three flagged categories matter in sequence. Governance determines who controls protocol parameters and emergency levers. Operations covers the custodial and redemption machinery that keeps a peg stable under stress. Revenue sharing shapes the incentive alignment between issuers, distributors, and holders — and has historically been a fault line in stablecoin designs that looked sound on paper.
Circle's Counterargument
Against that backdrop, Circle's CEO chose network as the ground to defend. The network-advantage argument for USDC centers on distribution depth: the number of chains, wallets, exchanges, and payment integrations where USDC already clears, versus what any new entrant must build or negotiate from scratch. Network effects in stablecoins compound through liquidity — a coin already present in deep order books and treasury management flows is harder to displace than unit economics alone would suggest.
What the Source Does Not Yet Resolve
Bernstein's dual signal — strongest challenger, but governance gaps — leaves the central question open. OUSD's ability to convert analytical recognition into on-chain volume will depend on how quickly those unresolved structural questions get answered. Circle and Tether have each faced analogous scrutiny at earlier stages; how each resolved transparency and governance concerns shaped their subsequent adoption trajectories. For OUSD, those resolutions remain ahead of it.
Related reading
Filed via cointelegraph.com