NewsMV
The CLARITY Act is in focus after former US Defense Secretary Mark Esper argued publicly that the legislation is a national security measure, not a financial services one.
Esper, who led the Department of Defense, is lending that credential to a debate Congress has largely framed as a crypto regulation question.
The next confirmable milestone is a committee vote or a formal co-sponsorship from a defense-focused lawmaker.
A different frame Esper's position is direct: the CLARITY Act should be understood through a national security lens. That is a departure from the financial services framing that has defined the bill's positioning so far.
Keep reading